@Taj
I believe the tariffs will hit Ford and GM the hardest.
@Taj
But if gas cars are still what Americans want, maybe Ford and GM can survive by sticking to that market?
@MustangMania
You’ve definitely pointed out a key issue. I suspect the US is at a crossroads. With many challenges ahead, they might prioritize AI over EVs for now, switching back later once they’ve solidified their tech. That may change the future landscape.
@MustangMania
I’ve seen that the 2025 Flash will likely have reduced power due to the changes they’ve made.
From what I understand, the next gen Lightning and a new midsize BEV pickup are still on track for release around 2027-2028. They’re committed to a range of BEVs. However, they’ve decided against the full-size SUV BEV. They’re realizing that full-size BEVs are complicated, especially when it comes to range and costs. They’re likely shifting focus to smaller vehicles which have better profit margins.
I heard they aren’t looking to create bigger trucks at this time. They might electrify the Maverick soon. That seems like a smart move. They are still on board with the Lightning but not the bigger models for now.
I think there will be an EREV option, but I’m not convinced Ford will just scrap the BEV concept.
I really love my Lightning for so many reasons…
The talk around BEV profitability seems to focus on smaller vehicles now. Early, there was talk of big vehicles being the future. Then interest rates changed and demand dipped, leading to challenges in that idea. It’s a tough market right now.
I don’t get the hybrid idea. It just complicates things. Can’t we just choose either gas or electric?
If I’d had the chance to choose the RamCharger, I might’ve done it, but no regrets with my Lightning. It’s a solid choice. Having worked in the industry, I can say the domestic manufacturers seem reactive and lack long-term strategy. Companies like Toyota are really ahead with their planning. At the end of the day, no one can really predict what manufacturers will do, regardless of their statements. If you want a Lightning, go for it.
Think about all the people in coastal areas from North Carolina to Texas who need vehicles to get out during storms. The charging infrastructure just won’t support that level of demand. Traffic can be a nightmare during evacuations, too.
@Zoe
True, but in a jam like that, EVs can be efficient. Remember, when idle, they aren’t using energy.
RichardMiller said:
@Zoe
True, but in a jam like that, EVs can be efficient. Remember, when idle, they aren’t using energy.
I would’ve loved having a Lightning for two years. But the price was sky-high. I drive less than 8k miles a year now, so it’s not worth the investment. Plus, long evacuations are tough, and an EV isn’t always best for that scenario. I just want the option of powering my home if needed. I believe that having the generator on EVs would be a huge benefit.
@Zoe
During my evacuation for Irma, I didn’t even have to leave the state. If I had an F-150, I could’ve easily returned home with almost a full charge and powered my condo with ProPower.
Shane said:
@Zoe
During my evacuation for Irma, I didn’t even have to leave the state. If I had an F-150, I could’ve easily returned home with almost a full charge and powered my condo with ProPower.
I get what you mean about range anxiety. But if everyone drove EVs, charging stations would be overwhelmed during mass evacuations. Even with backup options, it doesn’t address the core issues that come with traveling with an EV in emergencies.
@Zoe
I’ve had issues with fuel pumps and belts causing delays on long trips. I guess I have ICE anxiety too!
I’m okay if Ford shifts the F150 to EREV if they think that’s the best way forward. I believe they should really consider the Ranger as a BEV platform instead for a better daily driver option. A midsize would’ve been a better fit for my needs.
@Juliet
Many might feel the same. They probably think they can charge more for a full electric F150. A smaller model like a Maverick BEV could do really well.
Manufacturers will always prioritize what benefits them the most financially rather than what consumers genuinely want. I think a hybrid truck like RAM is pursuing is what we need, merging big batteries with ICE just for battery refills. But consumers’ opinions won’t change much of their decisions.