Who is the Ranger Super Duty really made for?

A lot of folks in Australia seem hyped about the Ranger Super Duty. It’s a smaller ute that can tow 4,500kg and carry a 1-tonne load.

Some are calling it a competitor to the F150. But where does it actually fit? The regular Ranger is already $48-97k, so the Super Duty is likely to cost more. If the top-end Super Duty is priced around $110-115k, wouldn’t the F150 at $118-154k look like a better deal? It’s bigger, with more space and features.

If they price it too low, why pay $100k for a Super Duty XLT when you could get a regular Ranger Platinum for $13k less? Plus, if they stick to only two trims (XL and XLT), as some media outlets claim, will this even be a ute people need?

This seems like it’ll be big with Overlanders. They love turning their trucks into mobile campers, even if it means going over the factory payload rating.

A full-size American truck is too bulky for tight trails and daily driving. Ford probably thinks this niche market, plus some fleet sales, makes it worth upgrading the Ranger.

I doubt it’ll be a big seller, but for those wanting heavy-duty capability in a smaller truck, it’s a great option. Wish my F150 had a better payload!

@Brady
If they spec it right, it’ll sell to folks who need a smaller truck to haul expensive toys like race cars. Big trucks aren’t great on narrow roads, so that towing bump will make life easier.

I think it’s aimed at government departments that used to run G Professionals or 70 Series V8s. Just a guess though.

Cassian said:
I think it’s aimed at government departments that used to run G Professionals or 70 Series V8s. Just a guess though.

But is that enough of a market to justify building a whole new model?

Many departments dropped the Land Cruiser to seem more eco-friendly. After all the issues with the Victorian government’s Gelandewagens, others canceled their orders. Even the Army doesn’t seem happy with their choice.

@Sage
We haven’t seen much yet, just teasers. Someone mentioned it’s running 10-stud axles. Maybe it’s a tougher Ranger XLT with a high-output or tuned 3.0L Lion V6 diesel. It could fill the gap between an F150’s capacity but keep the Ranger’s size.

There’s a crowd missing the V8 Land Cruiser. This might grab their attention. If it only has the Lion V6, it could still be a hit with Overlanders if it hauls enough. Just my two cents though—I could be way off :sweat_smile:.

This is for people who need to tow more than 3,500kg. It’ll overlap with regular Ranger prices but cost a bit more for comparable trims.

I’ve heard they’re looking at XLT and something like a Wildtrak trim, but that info might be outdated. The Australian test vehicles seem close to XLT specs.

As for competing with the F150, I don’t think they’ll price it that high. And those Australian F150 conversions aren’t exactly the best quality.

We don’t get those in the US. Got any links or info about them?

Murphy said:
We don’t get those in the US. Got any links or info about them?

Here’s a couple of articles:

@Sage
An 8,000kg gross combined weight on a Ranger is insane.

Murphy said:
@Sage
An 8,000kg gross combined weight on a Ranger is insane.

What do you mean by gross combined weight?

Sage said:

Murphy said:
@Sage
An 8,000kg gross combined weight on a Ranger is insane.

What do you mean by gross combined weight?

It’s the max legal weight for the truck, trailer, and load combined. So for this, it’s 8,000kg (about 17,635 lbs for us in the US).

@Murphy
Ah, got it. You said cross combined earlier, which threw me off.

@Sage
Man, the US always misses out on the cool stuff.